Why do all movie tickets cost the same?  Movie tickets don't fluctuate in price 
according to supply and demand. Blockbuster sellouts and movie flops all
 sell for the same price. To explain this occurence, an article from The Atlantic briefly explains the history of movie prices, demonstrating that during
 the first half of the twentieth century, movie tickets used to cost 
different amounts depending on their actors and popularity. Since this time, the system gradually shifted so that ticket prices from the 
1970s onwards have been generally uniform across movies. 
The
 line graph depicts how theater attendance fluctuates through the year. 
Christmas is shown as the high point of the year in terms of ticket sales, while the time periods directly following Easter and Labor Day see relatively low ticket sales.
The
 chart does have a few shortcomings, however. The article fails to tell 
us the data's source. We do not know whether the graph is 
plotting the data from a single theater, or from an aggregate of 
theaters of over the course of a year. We also don't know when the data 
were collected. The article doesn't communicate what year or years the data come 
from, and there is no caption or title to further explain these details. It is also unclear what the unit of measurement is. Does 12% 
average weekly attendance convey the proportion of seats that are filled in a theater? 
Does 4% attendance during a given week represent how much that this 
specific week accounts for in the year's attendance?
Though displaying several trends on one set of axes, the
 second graph is significantly clearer. The graph shows tickets per capita and the 
average price of a ticket from 1929 through 2001. Unlike the first graph, the axes are well 
labeled and they clarify the unit of measure. Although the bar chart and
 trend graph are superimposed on each other, they utilize the better 
part of the chart area. Unfortunately, the chart does not include 
the source of the data or a title, both of which would further 
clarify the the meaning of the information being represented. It would 
also be useful to articulate whether admissions prices are adjusted 
for inflation, a factor that is necessary to take into account when 
looking at such a large time span.
About TeachingwithData.org
TeachingWithData.org is a partnership between the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) and the Social Science Data Analysis Network (SSDAN), both at the University of Michigan. The project is funded by NSF Award 0840642, George Alter (ICPSR), PI and William Frey (SSDAN), co-PI.
Translate
Search This Blog
Popular Posts
- 
A study recently featured in the Journal of Comparative Economics examines income inequality in urban China. Capital income increased d...
- 
A recent post on the Economist’s Graphic Detail blog includes a global map of cigarette smokers in 2010, as reported by the American Cance...
- 
The month of March signaled the beginning of National Women’s History Month, as well as the annual Oscar Awards ceremony, which was held on...
- 
According to the Washington Post, since 2009, the unemployment rate in the United States has dropped by 50% . The traditional...
- 
If you’ve hit the point in the semester where your classes have fallen into routines and you’d like to spice things up a bit, this webinar i...
 


 
 
 
 
Good communication is important. It can help someone to understand what another person is saying. It also means that they can express their own needs and concerns. When someone is seriously ill, there will be many things that need to be discussed. Some of these discussions may be difficult and emotional. For further reading, see the link below.
ReplyDeletecommunication @
www.inspgift.com
your website awesomely carries good data.
ReplyDeletewww.joeydavila.net