According to a recent New York Times article, "The Not-So-Hidden Cause Behind the A.D.H.D Epidemic," the sharp increase in the number of diagnoses of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder over the past few decades--from less than five percent of school-age kids in the 1990s, to 11 percent in 2013--coincides with three important policy changes that incentivized diagnosis.
The first was the writing of A.D.H.D. into the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act of 1991. This meant that individuals diagnosed with A.D.H.D. could have access to tutors, and could be granted extra time on standardized tests, explains Pacific University sociologist Adam Rafalovich.
A few years later in 1997, changes to the Food and Drug Administration's restrictions made it easier for drug companies to market directly to the public. Teachers and parents became aware that A.D.H.D. medications existed. "The diagnosis became increasingly normalized, until it was viewed by many as just another part of the experience of childhood."
The third policy change associated with increases in A.D.H.D. diagnoses was discovered by Stephen Hinshaw (professor of psychology at University of California, Berkeley) and his team, who were puzzled by state variation in rates of A.D.H.D. (the rate is twice as high in North Carolina than in California, for instance). They looked at a number of possible sociological factors (such as race, income, differences in diagnostic tools, types of health insurance, cultural values, and public perceptions of mental illness)--none of which were found to have a significant effect on diagnoses. However they did find that "when a state passed laws punishing or rewarding schools for their standardized-test scores, A.D.H.D. diagnoses in that state would increase not long afterward. Nationwide, the rates of A.D.H.D. diagnosis increased by 22 percent in the first four years after No Child Left Behind was implemented."
The correlation may be explained by the fact that A.D.H.D. medication boosts test performance by allowing children to focus better and not be a distraction to others. In addition, some school districts remove the test scores of children diagnosed with A.D.H.D. from the school's official average. Together, says Hinshaw, these provide "incentives to boost the diagnosis of the disorder, regardless of its biological prevalence."
Read more:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/20/magazine/the-not-so-hidden-cause-behind-the-adhd-epidemic.html?pagewanted=1&_r=3&ref=todayspaper
TeachingwithData.org resources:
Data Resource Center for Child & Adolescent Health (http://www.childhealthdata.org/browse/rankings)
Unknown
About TeachingwithData.org
TeachingWithData.org is a partnership between the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) and the Social Science Data Analysis Network (SSDAN), both at the University of Michigan. The project is funded by NSF Award 0840642, George Alter (ICPSR), PI and William Frey (SSDAN), co-PI.
Translate
Search This Blog
Popular Posts
-
A study recently featured in the Journal of Comparative Economics examines income inequality in urban China. Capital income increased d...
-
If you’ve hit the point in the semester where your classes have fallen into routines and you’d like to spice things up a bit, this webinar i...
-
A recent post on the Economist’s Graphic Detail blog includes a global map of cigarette smokers in 2010, as reported by the American Cance...
-
According to the Washington Post, since 2009, the unemployment rate in the United States has dropped by 50% . The traditional...
-
The month of March signaled the beginning of National Women’s History Month, as well as the annual Oscar Awards ceremony, which was held on...
No comments :
Post a Comment